Skip to Content

How Grizzly Bears in Montana Are Making a Major Comeback

Grizzly Bear
Grizzly Bear. Image by SURZet via Depositphotos.

In the rugged wilderness of Montana, a remarkable conservation success story is unfolding. Grizzly bears, once facing the threat of extinction in the lower 48 states, are making an impressive comeback across Montana’s diverse landscapes. This resurgence represents not only a triumph for wildlife conservation efforts but also presents new challenges for coexistence between these magnificent apex predators and human communities. From near extinction to a growing population of over 1,000 bears in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem alone, the grizzly’s journey illustrates the complex interplay between wildlife management, habitat preservation, and human adaptation that defines modern conservation.

The Historic Decline of Grizzly Bears in Montana

A grizzly bear wandering on the woods.
A grizzly bear wandering on the woods. Image via Pexels

Montana’s grizzly bear population experienced a catastrophic decline throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries. When Lewis and Clark explored the region in the early 1800s, an estimated 50,000 grizzlies roamed across the western United States. By 1975, when grizzlies received protection under the Endangered Species Act, fewer than 1,000 remained in the lower 48 states, with Montana harboring a significant portion of the survivors. This dramatic decline resulted from a lethal combination of habitat loss, systematic hunting, predator control programs, and human expansion. The bears were widely viewed as dangerous nuisances and obstacles to development, leading to their deliberate extermination from approximately 98% of their original range in the continental United States. By the time federal protection was implemented, grizzlies in Montana were primarily confined to isolated pockets in and around Glacier National Park and parts of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

A majestic grizzly bear standing near a pond in its natural habitat, full of life.
“Grizzly Bear” image by Photo by Pixabay via Pexels

The 1975 listing of grizzly bears as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act marked a turning point for the species in Montana. This federal protection made it illegal to hunt or kill grizzlies except in cases of self-defense or defense of property. The ESA listing also mandated the creation of recovery plans and critical habitat designations. The Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee, formed in 1983, brought together federal, state, and tribal agencies to coordinate conservation efforts. Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWP) developed specific grizzly bear management plans tailored to the state’s unique ecological and social contexts. These legal frameworks provided the essential foundation for recovery by addressing direct mortality, habitat conservation, and conflict prevention. Without these protections and the accompanying enforcement mechanisms, Montana’s grizzly bear population would likely have continued its decline toward extinction rather than achieving its remarkable recovery.

The Current Status of Montana’s Grizzly Population

Grizzly Bear
Grizzly Bear in snow. Image via Joe Lieb/USFWS, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Today, Montana’s grizzly bear population has rebounded significantly, with approximately 1,800-2,000 bears estimated across the state’s various ecosystems. The Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE), centered around Glacier National Park, hosts the largest population with over 1,000 bears and an annual growth rate of approximately 2-3%. The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem contains about 700-750 grizzlies, including bears that move between Montana, Wyoming, and Idaho. Perhaps most encouragingly, bears are now naturally expanding into historic habitat in the Bitterroot Ecosystem and areas between the established recovery zones. Montana FWP monitoring data indicates that bear density in core habitats has increased substantially, with some areas approaching ecological carrying capacity. Genetic diversity has improved as previously isolated populations begin to reconnect. The population’s sex ratio has balanced, and reproductive rates have stabilized at healthy levels. These metrics collectively indicate a robust recovery trend, though challenges remain in ensuring long-term population viability across the state’s diverse landscapes.

Key Recovery Zones in Montana

brown bear walking near trees
Grizzly Bear. Image via Unsplash.

Montana encompasses critical portions of four designated grizzly bear recovery zones, each contributing uniquely to the species’ comeback. The Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) spans approximately 9,600 square miles from Glacier National Park south to Missoula, representing the largest and most robust recovery zone with over 1,000 bears. The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) includes southwestern Montana along with parts of Wyoming and Idaho, supporting about 700-750 bears in a remarkable recovery from just 136 bears in the 1970s. The Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem in northwestern Montana has shown slower but steady progress, with approximately 50-60 bears establishing residence. The Bitterroot Ecosystem, while officially designated for recovery, currently hosts only occasional dispersing bears rather than an established population. Most encouraging is the documented movement of grizzlies between these recovery zones, particularly between the NCDE and Cabinet-Yaak areas, suggesting the beginnings of genetic connectivity that could strengthen the entire metapopulation. These recovery zones function as interconnected hubs in Montana’s grizzly bear conservation network, each facing unique challenges and opportunities.

Natural Habitat Expansion and Connectivity

brown bear near grass field
Grizzly Bears. Image via Unsplash

One of the most significant aspects of Montana’s grizzly bear recovery is the natural expansion of the species into historic habitats. GPS collar data and field observations confirm that bears are reclaiming territories they haven’t occupied in decades. Particularly notable is the movement of bears eastward from the Rocky Mountain Front onto the plains, where they historically thrived before European settlement. Wildlife corridors such as the Ninemile Valley and the area between the NCDE and Yellowstone are increasingly seeing grizzly activity, suggesting the early stages of population connectivity. This natural expansion is ecologically significant as it indicates healthy reproduction rates and shows bears adapting to diverse Montana landscapes. Genetic studies reveal encouraging signs of intermixing between previously isolated populations, bolstering genetic diversity crucial for long-term species health. However, this expansion also brings bears into new areas where residents may have little experience with grizzly behavior, creating novel management challenges. Conservation biologists consider this habitat connectivity essential for maintaining genetic diversity and allowing the population to adjust to climate change, shifting food resources, and other environmental pressures.

The Role of Conservation Organizations

Why Alaska Is the Best Place to Witness Grizzly Bears Fishing
Why Alaska Is the Best Place to Witness Grizzly Bears Fishing. Image via Depositphotos

Montana’s grizzly bear recovery has been significantly bolstered by the dedicated efforts of numerous conservation organizations working alongside government agencies. Groups like Vital Ground Foundation have strategically purchased over 40,000 acres of critical habitat and conservation easements, protecting key migration corridors and preventing development in sensitive areas. The Great Bear Foundation has pioneered educational programs reaching thousands of Montanans annually, promoting bear awareness and conflict prevention strategies. Defenders of Wildlife has implemented innovative solutions through their coexistence programs, providing range riders, electric fencing, and bear-resistant garbage containers to communities throughout grizzly country. People and Carnivores has worked directly with ranchers to develop and implement practical methods that reduce livestock depredation while allowing bears to survive. These organizations have collectively secured millions in private funding that supplements government budgets, allowing for rapid response to emerging threats and opportunities. Their grassroots nature enables them to build trust with local communities sometimes skeptical of federal initiatives. This collaborative approach between government agencies, non-profits, and local stakeholders has created a more robust and adaptable conservation framework than any single entity could achieve alone.

Scientific Research Guiding Recovery Efforts

Bear
Young Grizzly bear in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. Image via Depositphotos.

Cutting-edge scientific research has been instrumental in guiding Montana’s grizzly bear recovery strategies. The Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team, established in 1973, continues to conduct comprehensive population monitoring using DNA hair-snare studies, GPS collaring, and camera trap networks. These methods have allowed researchers to accurately estimate population size, track movement patterns, and assess reproductive rates with unprecedented precision. Nutritional ecology studies have revealed how Montana’s grizzlies adapt their diets to seasonal and geographical variations, helping managers predict and mitigate potential conflict areas during food shortages. Habitat selection research utilizing GPS collar data helps identify critical corridors and core habitats needing protection. Genetic research has documented improving diversity in previously isolated populations while identifying areas where connectivity remains challenged. Study of human-bear interactions has led to evidence-based conflict prevention strategies, with Montana State University researchers documenting the effectiveness of various deterrent methods. The integration of Traditional Ecological Knowledge from tribal partners with western scientific approaches has provided a more holistic understanding of grizzly ecology and behavior. This robust research foundation ensures that management decisions are adaptive and responsive to the complex dynamics of bear recovery across Montana’s diverse landscapes.

Human-Bear Conflict Management Innovations

North American Grizzly Bear in snow at spring in Western Canada.
North American Grizzly Bear in snow at spring in Western Canada. Image via Depositphotos.

As grizzly bears expand across Montana, innovative approaches to human-bear conflict management have become essential to continued recovery. Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks has established a network of bear management specialists who respond rapidly to conflict situations, employing non-lethal management techniques whenever possible. Electric fencing programs have successfully protected over 1,500 sites including apiaries, orchards, chicken coops, and calving areas, reducing conflicts by more than 80% in participating communities. Bear-resistant garbage container distribution programs in communities like Whitefish and Red Lodge have dramatically reduced trash-related incidents. Range riders deployed in grazing areas provide human presence that deters predation while allowing for early detection of conflict situations. Community-based programs like Blackfoot Challenge have pioneered carcass removal services that collect and compost livestock that died from natural causes, eliminating a major attractant for bears. Aversive conditioning techniques, including the use of specially trained Karelian bear dogs, help teach problem bears to avoid human areas. Modern technology like trail cameras connected to alert systems provides early warning of bear presence near communities. These multifaceted approaches have collectively reduced serious conflicts while allowing bears to reoccupy historic ranges, demonstrating that coexistence is achievable with proper management tools and community engagement.

Cultural Significance and Changing Perceptions

grizzly bear
Grizzly bear. Image via Depositphotos.

The grizzly bear holds profound cultural significance in Montana, and changing perceptions have played a crucial role in its recovery. For Montana’s tribal nations, particularly the Blackfeet, Salish, Kootenai, and Crow, the grizzly (Mistakis in Blackfeet) remains a sacred being central to spiritual practices and cultural identity. Traditional knowledge regarding respectful coexistence with bears has increasingly informed management practices. Among the broader Montana population, attitudes have evolved significantly from the early 20th century view of grizzlies as dangerous obstacles to progress. Recent surveys by Montana State University reveal that 78% of Montanans now support grizzly recovery efforts, though support varies regionally. Tourism centered around bear viewing contributes approximately $30-50 million annually to Montana’s economy, creating economic incentives for conservation. Educational programs in schools and communities have fostered greater understanding of bear behavior and ecology. Local “bear aware” initiatives have empowered residents to take ownership of conflict prevention. Media coverage has shifted from sensationalizing attacks to providing nuanced coverage of coexistence successes. This cultural evolution toward viewing grizzlies as valuable components of Montana’s natural heritage rather than threats has created the social acceptance necessary for recovery to succeed across diverse landscapes, from wilderness areas to the periphery of rural communities.

Challenges to Continued Recovery

Grizzly bear
A portrait of a wild grizzly bear. By Jean Beaufort. Image via https://www.publicdomainpictures.net/en/view-image.php?image=300112&picture=grizzly-bear, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=82893998, via Wikimedia Commons.

Despite remarkable progress, Montana’s grizzly bear recovery faces substantial ongoing challenges that threaten long-term success. Habitat fragmentation continues as development pressures increase, with Montana experiencing some of the nation’s fastest population growth in areas like the Gallatin Valley and Flathead Valley that overlap with key bear habitat. Climate change is altering food availability, with declining whitebark pine nuts and cutthroat trout populations forcing dietary shifts that may increase human-bear conflicts. Recreational use in bear country has surged, with Montana state parks reporting a 40% increase in visitation since 2010, creating more potential for surprise encounters. Transportation corridors remain significant barriers to bear movement and sources of mortality, with vehicle collisions claiming 8-12 bears annually. The potential for delisting from Endangered Species Act protection creates uncertainty about future management, with concerns about premature hunting seasons before connectivity between recovery zones is established. Livestock depredation incidents have increased as bears expand eastward onto the plains where ranching is prevalent. Genetic isolation remains a concern, particularly for the Cabinet-Yaak population. Political polarization threatens the collaborative approach that has enabled recovery thus far. These multifaceted challenges require adaptive management strategies and continued commitment from diverse stakeholders to ensure the long-term viability of Montana’s grizzly bear population.

The Future of Grizzly Management in Montana

Grizzly Bear
Brown bear (ursus arctos) in a forest landscape. Image via Depositphotos.

The future of grizzly bear management in Montana will likely involve a complex balance of continued protection and increased local management authority. Federal delisting, at least for the Northern Continental Divide and Greater Yellowstone populations, appears probable within the next decade based on recovery metrics and political momentum. Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks has developed comprehensive state management plans that would take effect post-delisting, emphasizing maintained population monitoring, connectivity between ecosystems, and conflict prevention. These plans include population targets that would trigger management actions including potential limited hunting. Tribal co-management is gaining traction, with sovereign tribal nations seeking greater authority in determining grizzly management on and near reservation lands based on traditional ecological knowledge and cultural values. Technological innovations in non-lethal deterrents and real-time monitoring will likely play increasing roles in management strategies. Funding mechanisms are being explored to sustain conservation efforts beyond federal delisting, including conservation stamps, targeted tourism fees, and public-private partnerships. Climate adaptation strategies are being incorporated into management plans as changing conditions alter bear habitat and behavior. The emerging paradigm emphasizes proactive coexistence techniques rather than reactive conflict management. Success will ultimately depend on maintaining the collaborative approach that has enabled recovery thus far while adapting to new challenges in an evolving ecological and social landscape.

Success Stories of Coexistence

Grizzly Bears
Grizzly Bears, Image via Depositphotos.

Throughout Montana, inspiring success stories demonstrate that humans and grizzly bears can coexist productively across diverse landscapes. The Blackfoot Challenge, a watershed-wide collaborative in western Montana, has reduced grizzly conflicts by over 90% through their coordinated carcass removal program, range riders, and community education efforts. Since implementation, livestock losses have plummeted while bear populations have continued to grow. In the Madison Valley, a coalition of ranchers has successfully implemented non-lethal techniques including fladry (flagging that deters bears), guard dogs, and human presence, reducing depredation while maintaining viable ranching operations. The community of Whitefish has become a model for urban-wildlife interface management, adopting comprehensive bear-smart ordinances that have reduced conflicts by 67% since 2008 despite increasing bear presence. Indigenous-led initiatives on the Blackfeet Reservation have revitalized traditional coexistence practices while employing modern technology, resulting in declining conflict rates and cultural revitalization. These success stories share common elements: they’re community-driven, adapt to local conditions, employ multiple tools rather than seeking single solutions, and recognize the value of both human livelihoods and wildlife conservation. As grizzlies continue expanding their range, these proven approaches provide templates that can be customized for communities throughout Montana, demonstrating that recovery and coexistence are not just aspirational goals but achievable realities.

The Remarkable Recovery Journey Continues

Bear
Grizzly Bear. Image by Simon Hurry via Pexels.

Montana’s grizzly bear recovery represents one of North America’s most impressive conservation achievements, transforming a species on the brink of extirpation into a resilient population reclaiming historic territories. This remarkable journey from fewer than 1,000 bears in the lower 48 states in 1975 to approximately 2,000 in Montana alone demonstrates the effectiveness of coordinated conservation efforts when backed by legal protections, scientific research, and community engagement. The recovery illustrates how apex predators can return to complex, working landscapes when management approaches balance ecological needs with human concerns. As grizzlies continue expanding into areas where they’ve been absent for generations, both bears and humans are adapting to renewed coexistence, writing the next chapter in Montana’s rich natural history. The ongoing success of this recovery effort will ultimately depend on maintaining the collaborative spirit that has brought the great bear back from the edge of extinction while addressing emerging challenges with innovation and respect for diverse perspectives.

Latest posts by Esther Evangeline, MSc Zoology (see all)